KAS (KAS)

@Dr_Gonzo_K @cryptogenerian Did someone say education? (With how dead twitter is, it would probably help if people were to share educational information about Kaspa...been here for years trying to share it with anyone interested...) https://t.co/lX77XGD25i https://t.co/XVUuSBrSVB

PSA: A huge announcement, $KAS and $ETH holders. 🚨 In preparation for mainnet launch, the Stroem team will launch an incentivised testnet program to promote further testing. We encourage everyone to share and follow to ensure that you do not miss out on the next announcements.

https://t.co/lpmiycYUBl U know what is that? first post-quantum signature on kaspa just landed. XMSS^MT The script is huge (~84KB) because it has to unroll a loop of ~1,650 hashings on-chain but it verifies. and it works. isn't that cool? toccata to everyone

https://t.co/lpmiycYUBl U know what is that? first post-quantum signature on kaspa just landed. XMSS^MT The script is huge (~84KB) because it has to unroll a loop of ~1,650 hashings on-chain but it verifies. and it works. isn't that cool? toccata to everyone

https://t.co/lpmiycYUBl U know what is that? first post-quantum signature on kaspa just landed. XMSS^MT The script is huge (~84KB) because it has to unroll a loop of ~1,650 hashings on-chain but it verifies. and it works. isn't that cool? toccata to everyone

Interesting work from @Max143672 exploring XMSS^MT, a NIST-approved post‑quantum signature scheme for Kaspa wallets. Simply put, it’s an experiment in how Kaspa users could one day secure their wallets using cryptography designed to remain secure even against future quantum computers. Why is that interesting? Blockchains are built to preserve value and records for decades. A wallet created today may still hold assets 10, 20, or even 50 years from now. Research like this asks an important question: How do we protect long‑lived digital assets in a world where computing continues to evolve? This implementation supports roughly 16 million signatures and distributes signing responsibilities across multiple devices, making it an interesting exploration of both security and usability. ⚠️ As noted by Max, this is experimental research only, has not been audited, and is not intended for production use or securing real funds. Still, it’s great to see builders exploring what long‑term cryptographic resilience could look like on Kaspa.

https://t.co/lpmiycYUBl U know what is that? first post-quantum signature on kaspa just landed. XMSS^MT The script is huge (~84KB) because it has to unroll a loop of ~1,650 hashings on-chain but it verifies. and it works. isn't that cool? toccata to everyone

https://t.co/lpmiycYUBl U know what is that? first post-quantum signature on kaspa just landed. XMSS^MT The script is huge (~84KB) because it has to unroll a loop of ~1,650 hashings on-chain but it verifies. and it works. isn't that cool? toccata to everyone

Why? @anbrandenburger because you reposted, and @HeavyHashMedia because I think this argument skips actual tradeoffs If the network is cheap enough that spam becomes persistent background noise, this is not free adoption. It creates costs for wallets, indexers, exchanges, explorers, devs, and anyone trying to integrate with Kaspa. Is this really usage we want to subsidize? “Kaspa replaces fiat” jumps from 0 to 100 before we are even at 1. Before this matters, broader crypto has to prove it can replace fiat-scale usage without leaning on stablecoins and custodial rails Kaspa will still be extremely cheap to use after the fee increase. The question is not whether fees can be near zero forever. The question is whether real usage remains cheap while spam and low-value abuse become less attractive Cheap for real users is good. Cheap enough to make the network harder to integrate with is a problem The goal should be a fee floor that makes spam non-negligible, while keeping real usage negligible