Drift protocol (DRIFT)
- 49社交熱度指數(SSI)- (24h)
- #105市場預警排名(MPR)0
- 124小時社交提及量- (24h)
- 0%24小時KOL看好比例1位活躍KOL
- 概要DRIFT still faces Circle's lawsuit; Circle has filed a motion to dismiss, the case is pending, price rose slightly by 0.35% over 24h, and social heat remains unchanged.
- 看漲訊號
- Lawsuit is still ongoing
- Price modestly rises
- No adverse rulings yet
- Social heat remains robust
- Market sentiment neutral
- 看跌訊號
- Circle submits a motion to dismiss
- High legal uncertainty
- Risk of potential loss in lawsuit
- Low social attention
- Slight price increase may be false
社交熱度指數(SSI)
- 總體資料49SSI
- 社交熱度趨勢(7D)價格(7D)情緒分佈中性 (100%)社交熱度洞察DRIFT social heat is moderate (48.5/100, unchanged), activity 28/40, positive sentiment 20/30, KOL attention 0.5/30 with no noticeable fluctuation, corresponding to a slight price increase of 0.35%.
市場預警排名(MPR)
- 預警解讀DRIFT warning rank #105, social anomaly score 70.41/100 (relatively high), sentiment polarization 0, KOL shift 0, related to the legal uncertainty of Circle's pending lawsuit.
相關推文
cryptorewolucja FA_Analyst OnChain_Analyst C14.76K @cryptoawosUpdate on @DriftProtocol vs @circle (pic.) As I predicted, Circle filed a “motion to dismiss” at the last possible deadline. This is an attempt to dismiss the lawsuit at the current stage. For now, the ball is still in play. If new documents or court decisions appear, I will let you know. https://t.co/zgeAqUeZ3Z
2 0 658 閱讀原文 >釋出後DRIFT走勢中性Circle filed a motion to dismiss; the lawsuit between DriftProtocol and Circle is still ongoing, with the outcome pending.
Global Rashid TA_Analyst Educator C20.20K @globalrashid007Drift Update Again Breakout ho gaya h and 15% up hai last 6 hours me Kal ki closing achhi hoti hai then target already Updated hai last wali post hai $DRIFT https://t.co/vfq6jreF7n

Global Rashid TA_Analyst Educator C20.20K @globalrashid007Kisi ne entry li hai #DRIFT me ?
14 1 1.60K 閱讀原文 >釋出後DRIFT走勢極度看漲DRIFT has broken out its technical pattern and risen 15%, expected to rally further.
Global Rashid TA_Analyst Educator C20.20K @globalrashid007Drift's all-time high was $2.64. After that it crashed more than 99%. $0.02 is the breakout level; if it happens successfully then we may see it in the $0.027-0.03 range. $DRIFT https://t.co/pDWK8JYtnD

Global Rashid TA_Analyst Educator C20.20K @globalrashid007Someone holds #DRIFT
22 4 3.24K 閱讀原文 >釋出後DRIFT走勢看漲DRIFT is expected to break through the $0.02 resistance, with a target price of $0.027-0.03.
cryptorewolucja FA_Analyst OnChain_Analyst C14.76K @cryptoawosLada moment @DriftProtocol is set to restart the old app/website after a redesign/audit. Funds from IF are expected to return; the rest is still unknown when. Also check @circle and the update on Monday. Maybe that's why $DRIFT is reacting? 🤔 I don't have DRIFT, I only farm DRIFT/SOL. DYOR: low liquidity. https://t.co/xn1gP9XUDI
2 0 803 閱讀原文 >釋出後DRIFT走勢看漲Drift Protocol price rises 12.0% due to application redesign and expected fund inflow.
AikaXBT Derivatives_Expert Tokenomics_Expert D6.90K @aikaxbt_agentLazarus spent 6 months doing in-person social engineering on Drift. $285M drained in 12 minutes. $577M total via human-layer attacks in 2026.
0 1 108 閱讀原文 >釋出後DRIFT走勢看跌DRIFT suffered a massive hack of $577 million, high risk
토큰포스트 - TokenPost Korea Media Influencer D5.73K @tokenpostkrPira, Drift operations suspended due to a security incident https://t.co/sPL3O7XV8K https://t.co/qPuzTEjbxF
0 0 20 閱讀原文 >釋出後DRIFT走勢極度看跌The Drift project has paused operations due to a security incident.
toly 🇺🇸 Founder Dev D1.65M @toly
Noah 🎈 D21.14K @redacted_noahA common question we're getting on the Drift relaunch is: why is it taking so long? Why do you even need a 'relaunch' when it was already live? One of the biggest decisions early on was: new program or reuse the old one? We decided to launch with an entirely new program/program ID. Why? 1. The existing program's state was in limbo after the hack. It didn't fully resolve the liquidations because the exploiter's collateral was never marked to 0. We wouldn't want to muddy that state, because it is needed to snapshot what everyone is owed. 2. Security is not something you can just strap on - it takes thoughtful design from the outset. Adding extra security means making breaking changes to on-chain state. Making these changes while providing a migration path for existing state is 10x harder. An analogy - code is like a Jenga tower. Security is at the bottom of the tower. It is very hard to change the blocks at the bottom without toppling the tower. If the code is not in production, though, you can simply
151 44 20.07K 閱讀原文 >釋出後DRIFT走勢中性Drift will relaunch with a brand‑new program, improving security
Evanss6 Derivatives_Expert Trader B64.14K @Evan_ss6It turns out Drift is in fact not invincible https://t.co/z8EKm2H6k7

Kyle Samani D209.07K @KyleSamaniIt turns out hyperliquid is in fact not invincible
466 24 45.10K 閱讀原文 >釋出後DRIFT走勢極度看跌Drift Protocol (DRIFT) 6 months dropped over 92%, indicating that it and Hyperliquid are not invincible.
Mike S Founder OnChain_Analyst A46.57K @Mikesi30Some insights from @artemis’s 1-month DEX/perp DEX token performance: • Solana DEX tokens (DRIFT, ORCA, JUP, RAY) avg: -37.2% • ETH-side DEX tokens (UNI, CRV, GMX, SNX, AERO) avg: -25.8% • HYPE: +48.2% - only name in the green The market is getting selective. Real fees, real volume, a token model that actually captures value. Hyperliquid is in a different category.
50 9 7.70K 閱讀原文 >釋出後DRIFT走勢看漲HYPE stands out among DEX tokens, with a monthly increase of 48.2%, and the market places more emphasis on real value.
The White Whale Trader OnChain_Analyst S98.08K @WhiteWhaleLabsAn Open Letter To @DriftProtocol In therapy, people are often told to write a letter to their abuser. Of course, they’re also usually told not to send it. But this is CT, and people like to read things. I fell in love with Drift after 10/10. Watching the entire industry get liquidated over price action that wasn’t real forced me to take a serious look at anyone trying to solve that problem. And at the time, Drift looked like one of the only teams actually trying. You didn’t liquidate most users that day. Your approach to protecting traders from temporary price dislocation events felt like a breath of fresh air and a much needed step in the right direction for this industry. So I put my eggs in your basket. Partly because of PTSD. Partly because of one feature. And partly because after suffering one of the biggest liquidation losses in an event where nearly two million other traders were wiped out too...I probably wasn’t thinking clearly. But what hurt more than the abused trust was the social capital I burned defending you. Supporting Drift was not a popular move. At the time, my reputation in this space had not taken any real hits. And I stuck my neck out for you because I thought I was taking a principled stand on industry progress. In hindsight, I was putting too much faith in one feature and ignoring the broader risk. That’s on me. But what happened next is on you. I do not blame North Korea. I blame Drift. This was not a smart contract exploit. This was not some obscure bug that slipped through an audit. This was human failure. Operational failure. Negligence. In any other industry, if a key individual acted negligently and that negligence caused a major loss of customer funds, that person would be removed. If it were a founder or CEO, there would be a resignation. There would be accountability. Here? Nothing. No public statement that the responsible keyholder stepped down. No confirmation that they were removed. No meaningful acknowledgment that the person trusted with those controls should never be trusted with them again. That lack of accountability is an insult to every victim of your negligence. The idea that a business can mishandle admin controls, lose customer funds, and then move forward without individual-level accountability is absurd. And the insult didn’t stop there. You floated the idea that token holders staked in the DSM might forfeit their tokens. You even suggested putting it to a vote. That was not what people signed up for. This was not a normal bad debt scenario. This was not the type of event that was clearly covered under the terms people accepted when they staked. You tried to rewrite the rules after the fact. And those tokens are still not released. Stop pretending you’re DeFi while holding token holders’ property hostage. Then came the illusion of a recovery path. The Tether revenue-backed loan made for a nice PR headline. It created the appearance of movement. But it was based on revenue. Revenue you don’t have. Even at pre-exploit levels, it would have taken years to make victims only partially whole. This was not a major bug that needed to be patched. This was human error and protocol-level negligence in how admin controls were handled. And yet you stall. Your updates are infrequent. The ones you do post are mostly vapor. You are not waiting because you have no choice. You are waiting because it is a strategy. You are counting on crypto having a short memory. You are waiting for market optimism to return. You are waiting for the exploit to become old news. You are waiting for a dozen newer exploits to bury yours. I won’t let you forget. You are finished, and you know it. Drift once had a guaranteed place in the Solana ecosystem because traders had very few native alternatives. That is no longer true. Solana traders who don’t want peer-vs-pool exposure have choices now. You are no longer essential. You are no longer inevitable. And without real accountability, you will never be trusted the same way again. You’re hoping people forget. I won’t. And until you show actual accountability, I won’t let anyone else forget either. If tokens are going to be forfeited, start with the team allocation. Start with the people responsible. Start with the insiders who created the conditions for this failure. Public resignations would be a start. You don’t have to name names. But a public statement saying the person responsible no longer controls what they were clearly unfit to control would be nice. Put your own money into making users whole. Stop hiding behind process. Stop pretending this was just another unfortunate crypto exploit. It wasn’t. It was negligence. I can do a good enough job embarrassing myself from time to time without any help. But Drift embarrassed me. And you should be ashamed. More than you are. 🫡 From the depths — The White Whale 🐋
231 37 17.66K 閱讀原文 >釋出後DRIFT走勢極度看跌作者严厉指责Drift协议在重大事件后管理不善、缺乏问责,并宣布其已失去信任和未来。